Nuprl Lemma : cal-filter-decomp

∀[T:Type]. ∀[eq:EqDecider(T)]. ∀[P:fset(T) ⟶ 𝔹]. ∀[s:Point(constrained-antichain-lattice(T;eq;P))]. ∀[Q:{x:fset(T)| 
                                                                                                          ↑P[x]}  ⟶ 𝔹].
  (s = cal-filter(s;x.Q[x]) ∨ cal-filter(s;x.¬bQ[x]) ∈ Point(constrained-antichain-lattice(T;eq;P)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  cal-filter: cal-filter(s;x.P[x]),  constrained-antichain-lattice: constrained-antichain-lattice(T;eq;P),  lattice-join: a ∨ b,  lattice-point: Point(l),  fset: fset(T),  deq: EqDecider(T),  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  bool: 𝔹,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_apply: x[s],  set: {x:A| B[x]} ,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  top: Top,  lattice-point: Point(l),  record-select: r.x,  constrained-antichain-lattice: constrained-antichain-lattice(T;eq;P),  mk-bounded-distributive-lattice: mk-bounded-distributive-lattice,  mk-bounded-lattice: mk-bounded-lattice(T;m;j;z;o),  record-update: r[x := v],  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  eq_atom: x =a y,  bfalse: ff,  btrue: tt,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  so_apply: x[s],  prop: ℙ,  guard: {T},  and: P ∧ Q,  lattice-join: a ∨ b,  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  uimplies: b supposing a,  least-upper-bound: least-upper-bound(T;x,y.R[x; y];a;b;c),  cal-filter: cal-filter(s;x.P[x]),  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  cand: A c∧ B,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  fset-ac-le: fset-ac-le(eq;ac1;ac2),  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  or: P ∨ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  false: False,  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q)
Lemmas referenced :  cal-point,  cal-filter_wf,  fset_wf,  assert_wf,  bnot_wf,  fset-constrained-ac-lub-is-lub,  rec_select_update_lemma,  fset-antichain_wf,  fset-all_wf,  bool_wf,  set_wf,  deq_wf,  fset-ac-order,  least-upper-bound-unique,  fset-ac-le_wf,  fset-ac-order-constrained,  fset-constrained-ac-lub_wf,  fset-ac-le_weakening_f-subset,  fset-filter-subset2,  deq-fset_wf,  fset-member_wf,  fset-all-iff,  equal_functionality_wrt_subtype_rel2,  fset-subtype2,  fset-subtype,  subtype_rel_sets,  strong-subtype-deq-subtype,  strong-subtype-set2,  fset-null_wf,  fset-filter_wf,  deq-f-subset_wf,  all_wf,  iff_wf,  f-subset_wf,  iff_weakening_uiff,  uall_wf,  isect_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  member-fset-filter,  eqff_to_assert,  equal_wf,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  assert_of_bnot,  assert_witness
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  sqequalRule,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  hypothesis,  because_Cache,  cumulativity,  hypothesisEquality,  functionExtensionality,  applyEquality,  lambdaEquality,  lambdaFormation,  setElimination,  rename,  setEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  productElimination,  productEquality,  functionEquality,  axiomEquality,  universeEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  independent_functionElimination,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  promote_hyp,  instantiate

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}[eq:EqDecider(T)].  \mforall{}[P:fset(T)  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbB{}].  \mforall{}[s:Point(constrained-antichain-lattice(T;eq;P))].
\mforall{}[Q:\{x:fset(T)|  \muparrow{}P[x]\}    {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbB{}].
    (s  =  cal-filter(s;x.Q[x])  \mvee{}  cal-filter(s;x.\mneg{}\msubb{}Q[x]))



Date html generated: 2018_05_22-PM-09_54_47
Last ObjectModification: 2018_05_20-PM-10_12_00

Theory : lattices


Home Index