Nuprl Lemma : qsum-reciprocal-squares-bound

[J:ℕ]. Σ1 ≤ n < J. (1/n n) < 2


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  qsum: Σa ≤ j < b. E[j] qless: r < s qdiv: (r/s) qmul: s nat: uall: [x:A]. B[x] natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: [x:A]. B[x] member: t ∈ T all: x:A. B[x] decidable: Dec(P) or: P ∨ Q uimplies: supposing a sq_type: SQType(T) implies:  Q guard: {T} so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] subtype_rel: A ⊆B int_seg: {i..j-} nat: so_apply: x[s] nequal: a ≠ b ∈  ge: i ≥  lelt: i ≤ j < k and: P ∧ Q not: ¬A satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla) exists: x:A. B[x] false: False top: Top prop: uiff: uiff(P;Q) qsum: Σa ≤ j < b. E[j] qless: r < s grp_lt: a < b set_lt: a <b assert: b ifthenelse: if then else fi  set_blt: a <b b band: p ∧b q infix_ap: y set_le: b pi2: snd(t) oset_of_ocmon: g↓oset dset_of_mon: g↓set grp_le: b pi1: fst(t) qadd_grp: <ℚ+> q_le: q_le(r;s) callbyvalueall: callbyvalueall evalall: evalall(t) rng_sum: rng_sum mon_itop: Π lb ≤ i < ub. E[i] itop: Π(op,id) lb ≤ i < ub. E[i] ycomb: Y lt_int: i <j bfalse: ff grp_id: e add_grp_of_rng: r↓+gp rng_zero: 0 qrng: <ℚ+*> bor: p ∨bq qpositive: qpositive(r) qsub: s qadd: s qmul: s btrue: tt bnot: ¬bb qeq: qeq(r;s) eq_int: (i =z j) true: True squash: T iff: ⇐⇒ Q rev_implies:  Q nat_plus: + le: A ≤ B less_than': less_than'(a;b) subtract: m rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q)
Lemmas referenced :  decidable__equal_int subtype_base_sq int_subtype_base qless_witness qsum_wf qdiv_wf qmul_wf subtype_rel_set rationals_wf lelt_wf int-subtype-rationals qmul-mul int_entire_a int_seg_properties nat_properties satisfiable-full-omega-tt intformand_wf intformeq_wf itermVar_wf itermConstant_wf intformle_wf int_formula_prop_and_lemma int_formula_prop_eq_lemma int_term_value_var_lemma int_term_value_constant_lemma int_formula_prop_le_lemma int_formula_prop_wf equal-wf-base int-equal-in-rationals equal-wf-T-base not_wf nat_wf subtype_rel-equal int_seg_wf set_wf intformless_wf int_formula_prop_less_lemma qless_wf squash_wf true_wf sum_unroll_base_q iff_weakening_equal itermSubtract_wf intformnot_wf int_term_value_subtract_lemma int_formula_prop_not_lemma subtract_wf int-eq-in-rationals qsum-reciprocal-squares decidable__lt false_wf not-lt-2 not-equal-2 add_functionality_wrt_le add-associates add-zero zero-add le-add-cancel condition-implies-le add-commutes minus-add minus-zero le-add-cancel2 add-swap minus-minus minus-one-mul minus-one-mul-top less_than_wf qle_wf subtract-add-cancel qsub_wf qadd_preserves_qless qadd_wf qmul_preserves_qless qless-int qadd_ac_1_q qadd_comm_q qadd_inv_assoc_q qinverse_q mon_ident_q qmul_zero_qrng qmul-qdiv-cancel qless_transitivity_1_qorder
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution sqequalTransitivity computationStep sqequalReflexivity isect_memberFormation introduction cut extract_by_obid sqequalHypSubstitution dependent_functionElimination thin because_Cache natural_numberEquality hypothesis unionElimination instantiate isectElimination cumulativity intEquality independent_isectElimination independent_functionElimination sqequalRule lambdaEquality applyEquality hypothesisEquality setElimination rename productElimination lambdaFormation dependent_pairFormation int_eqEquality isect_memberEquality voidElimination voidEquality independent_pairFormation computeAll equalityTransitivity equalitySymmetry baseClosed addLevel impliesFunctionality multiplyEquality imageElimination imageMemberEquality universeEquality dependent_set_memberEquality addEquality minusEquality hyp_replacement

Latex:
\mforall{}[J:\mBbbN{}].  \mSigma{}1  \mleq{}  n  <  J.  (1/n  *  n)  <  2



Date html generated: 2016_10_26-AM-06_34_53
Last ObjectModification: 2016_07_12-AM-07_58_21

Theory : rationals


Home Index