Nuprl Lemma : rpositive2_functionality

∀x,y:ℕ+ ⟶ ℤ.  (bdd-diff(x;y) ⇒ (rpositive2(x) ⇐⇒ rpositive2(y)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  rpositive2: rpositive2(x),  bdd-diff: bdd-diff(f;g),  nat_plus: ℕ+,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  int: ℤ
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  rpositive2: rpositive2(x),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  prop: ℙ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  guard: {T},  bdd-diff: bdd-diff(f;g),  nat_plus: ℕ+,  nat: ℕ,  le: A ≤ B,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  not: ¬A,  false: False,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  uimplies: b supposing a,  subtract: n - m,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  top: Top,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  true: True,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  ge: i ≥ j ,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  sq_type: SQType(T),  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  bfalse: ff,  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q)
Lemmas referenced :  multiply_functionality_wrt_le,  le_weakening,  le_functionality,  add-swap,  mul-commutes,  mul-associates,  assert_of_bnot,  iff_weakening_uiff,  iff_transitivity,  eqff_to_assert,  assert_of_lt_int,  eqtt_to_assert,  bool_subtype_base,  bool_wf,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_cases,  int_term_value_minus_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  itermMinus_wf,  intformless_wf,  minus-is-int-iff,  not_wf,  bnot_wf,  assert_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  itermSubtract_wf,  subtract-is-int-iff,  add-is-int-iff,  int_subtype_base,  multiply-is-int-iff,  lt_int_wf,  absval_ifthenelse,  one-mul,  mul-swap,  mul-distributes,  mul-distributes-right,  mul_bounds_1a,  subtract_wf,  int_term_value_mul_lemma,  itermMultiply_wf,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  itermVar_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformle_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformand_wf,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  decidable__le,  nat_properties,  nat_plus_properties,  nat_plus_subtype_nat,  mul_preserves_le,  all_wf,  le_wf,  less_than_wf,  le-add-cancel,  add-zero,  add-associates,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  add-commutes,  minus-one-mul-top,  zero-add,  minus-one-mul,  minus-add,  condition-implies-le,  not-lt-2,  false_wf,  decidable__lt,  mul_nat_plus,  bdd-diff_inversion,  nat_plus_wf,  bdd-diff_wf,  rpositive2_wf
Rules used in proof :  cut,  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  productElimination,  thin,  lemma_by_obid,  isectElimination,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  functionEquality,  intEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  dependent_functionElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  addEquality,  because_Cache,  setElimination,  rename,  natural_numberEquality,  unionElimination,  voidElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  sqequalRule,  applyEquality,  lambdaEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidEquality,  minusEquality,  multiplyEquality,  int_eqEquality,  computeAll,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  baseClosed,  pointwiseFunctionality,  promote_hyp,  imageElimination,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  impliesFunctionality

Latex:
\mforall{}x,y:\mBbbN{}\msupplus{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbZ{}.    (bdd-diff(x;y)  {}\mRightarrow{}  (rpositive2(x)  \mLeftarrow{}{}\mRightarrow{}  rpositive2(y)))



Date html generated: 2016_05_18-AM-07_00_42
Last ObjectModification: 2016_01_17-AM-01_49_37

Theory : reals


Home Index