Nuprl Lemma : divide-le

∀[a:ℕ+]. ∀[b,x:ℤ].  uiff(b ≤ (a * x);adjust_div(b;a) ≤ x)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  adjust_div: adjust_div(b;a),  nat_plus: ℕ+,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  le: A ≤ B,  multiply: n * m,  int: ℤ
Definitions unfolded in proof :  adjust_div: adjust_div(b;a),  member: t ∈ T,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  nat_plus: ℕ+,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  false: False,  guard: {T},  uimplies: b supposing a,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  and: P ∧ Q,  less_than: a < b,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  top: Top,  true: True,  squash: ↓T,  le: A ≤ B,  bfalse: ff,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  or: P ∨ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  bnot: ¬bb,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  assert: ↑b,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  int_nzero: ℤ-o,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  decidable: Dec(P),  subtract: n - m,  nat: ℕ,  int_lower: {...i},  ge: i ≥ j ,  gt: i > j
Lemmas referenced :  lt_int_wf,  less_than_transitivity1,  le_weakening,  less_than_irreflexivity,  equal_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_lt_int,  top_wf,  less_than_wf,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  iff_transitivity,  assert_wf,  bnot_wf,  not_wf,  iff_weakening_uiff,  assert_of_bnot,  less_than'_wf,  adjust_div_wf,  subtype_rel_sets,  nequal_wf,  multiply-is-int-iff,  set_subtype_base,  int_subtype_base,  equal-wf-base,  le_wf,  nat_plus_wf,  decidable__le,  false_wf,  not-le-2,  condition-implies-le,  add-associates,  minus-add,  minus-one-mul,  add-swap,  minus-one-mul-top,  add-commutes,  zero-add,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  le-add-cancel2,  mul_preserves_le,  nat_plus_subtype_nat,  div_rem_sum,  subtract_wf,  mul-commutes,  add-mul-special,  two-mul,  mul-distributes-right,  zero-mul,  add-zero,  one-mul,  le_reflexive,  less-iff-le,  omega-shadow,  mul-distributes,  mul-associates,  mul-swap,  le-add-cancel-alt,  add-is-int-iff,  rem_bounds_1,  le_weakening2,  rem_bounds_2,  minus-zero,  le-add-cancel,  not-lt-2
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  natural_numberEquality,  remainderEquality,  because_Cache,  setElimination,  rename,  hypothesis,  lambdaFormation,  hypothesisEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  dependent_functionElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  voidElimination,  intEquality,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  productElimination,  sqequalRule,  lessCases,  isect_memberFormation,  sqequalAxiom,  isect_memberEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  voidEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  imageElimination,  independent_pairEquality,  lambdaEquality,  axiomEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  impliesFunctionality,  applyEquality,  setEquality,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  multiplyEquality,  addEquality,  divideEquality,  minusEquality,  sqequalIntensionalEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[a:\mBbbN{}\msupplus{}].  \mforall{}[b,x:\mBbbZ{}].    uiff(b  \mleq{}  (a  *  x);adjust\_div(b;a)  \mleq{}  x)



Date html generated: 2017_04_14-AM-07_19_44
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-02_54_03

Theory : arithmetic


Home Index