Nuprl Lemma : divide-le
∀[a:ℕ+]. ∀[b,x:ℤ].  uiff(b ≤ (a * x);adjust_div(b;a) ≤ x)
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement : 
adjust_div: adjust_div(b;a), 
nat_plus: ℕ+, 
uiff: uiff(P;Q), 
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x], 
le: A ≤ B, 
multiply: n * m, 
int: ℤ
Definitions unfolded in proof : 
adjust_div: adjust_div(b;a), 
member: t ∈ T, 
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x], 
nat_plus: ℕ+, 
nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T , 
not: ¬A, 
implies: P ⇒ Q, 
false: False, 
guard: {T}, 
uimplies: b supposing a, 
all: ∀x:A. B[x], 
prop: ℙ, 
bool: 𝔹, 
unit: Unit, 
it: ⋅, 
btrue: tt, 
uiff: uiff(P;Q), 
and: P ∧ Q, 
less_than: a < b, 
less_than': less_than'(a;b), 
top: Top, 
true: True, 
squash: ↓T, 
le: A ≤ B, 
bfalse: ff, 
exists: ∃x:A. B[x], 
or: P ∨ Q, 
sq_type: SQType(T), 
bnot: ¬bb, 
ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi , 
assert: ↑b, 
iff: P ⇐⇒ Q, 
rev_implies: P ⇐ Q, 
subtype_rel: A ⊆r B, 
int_nzero: ℤ-o, 
so_lambda: λ2x.t[x], 
so_apply: x[s], 
decidable: Dec(P), 
subtract: n - m, 
nat: ℕ, 
int_lower: {...i}, 
ge: i ≥ j , 
gt: i > j
Lemmas referenced : 
lt_int_wf, 
less_than_transitivity1, 
le_weakening, 
less_than_irreflexivity, 
equal_wf, 
bool_wf, 
eqtt_to_assert, 
assert_of_lt_int, 
top_wf, 
less_than_wf, 
eqff_to_assert, 
bool_cases_sqequal, 
subtype_base_sq, 
bool_subtype_base, 
iff_transitivity, 
assert_wf, 
bnot_wf, 
not_wf, 
iff_weakening_uiff, 
assert_of_bnot, 
less_than'_wf, 
adjust_div_wf, 
subtype_rel_sets, 
nequal_wf, 
multiply-is-int-iff, 
set_subtype_base, 
int_subtype_base, 
equal-wf-base, 
le_wf, 
nat_plus_wf, 
decidable__le, 
false_wf, 
not-le-2, 
condition-implies-le, 
add-associates, 
minus-add, 
minus-one-mul, 
add-swap, 
minus-one-mul-top, 
add-commutes, 
zero-add, 
add_functionality_wrt_le, 
le-add-cancel2, 
mul_preserves_le, 
nat_plus_subtype_nat, 
div_rem_sum, 
subtract_wf, 
mul-commutes, 
add-mul-special, 
two-mul, 
mul-distributes-right, 
zero-mul, 
add-zero, 
one-mul, 
le_reflexive, 
less-iff-le, 
omega-shadow, 
mul-distributes, 
mul-associates, 
mul-swap, 
le-add-cancel-alt, 
add-is-int-iff, 
rem_bounds_1, 
le_weakening2, 
rem_bounds_2, 
minus-zero, 
le-add-cancel, 
not-lt-2
Rules used in proof : 
sqequalSubstitution, 
sqequalTransitivity, 
computationStep, 
sqequalReflexivity, 
cut, 
introduction, 
extract_by_obid, 
sqequalHypSubstitution, 
isectElimination, 
thin, 
natural_numberEquality, 
remainderEquality, 
because_Cache, 
setElimination, 
rename, 
hypothesis, 
lambdaFormation, 
hypothesisEquality, 
independent_isectElimination, 
dependent_functionElimination, 
independent_functionElimination, 
voidElimination, 
intEquality, 
unionElimination, 
equalityElimination, 
equalityTransitivity, 
equalitySymmetry, 
productElimination, 
sqequalRule, 
lessCases, 
isect_memberFormation, 
sqequalAxiom, 
isect_memberEquality, 
independent_pairFormation, 
voidEquality, 
imageMemberEquality, 
baseClosed, 
imageElimination, 
independent_pairEquality, 
lambdaEquality, 
axiomEquality, 
dependent_pairFormation, 
promote_hyp, 
instantiate, 
cumulativity, 
impliesFunctionality, 
applyEquality, 
setEquality, 
baseApply, 
closedConclusion, 
multiplyEquality, 
addEquality, 
divideEquality, 
minusEquality, 
sqequalIntensionalEquality, 
dependent_set_memberEquality
Latex:
\mforall{}[a:\mBbbN{}\msupplus{}].  \mforall{}[b,x:\mBbbZ{}].    uiff(b  \mleq{}  (a  *  x);adjust\_div(b;a)  \mleq{}  x)
Date html generated:
2017_04_14-AM-07_19_44
Last ObjectModification:
2017_02_27-PM-02_54_03
Theory : arithmetic
Home
Index