Nuprl Lemma : AF-uniform-induction
∀[T:Type]. ∀[R:T ⟶ T ⟶ ℙ].
  (∀[Q:T ⟶ ℙ]. uniform-TI(T;x,y.¬R[x;y];t.Q[t])) supposing 
     (AFx,y:T.R[x;y] and 
     (∀x,y,z:T.  ((¬R[x;y]) 
⇒ (¬R[y;z]) 
⇒ (¬R[x;z]))))
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement : 
almost-full: AFx,y:T.R[x; y]
, 
uniform-TI: uniform-TI(T;x,y.R[x; y];t.Q[t])
, 
uimplies: b supposing a
, 
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x]
, 
prop: ℙ
, 
so_apply: x[s1;s2]
, 
so_apply: x[s]
, 
all: ∀x:A. B[x]
, 
not: ¬A
, 
implies: P 
⇒ Q
, 
function: x:A ⟶ B[x]
, 
universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof : 
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x]
, 
uimplies: b supposing a
, 
member: t ∈ T
, 
all: ∀x:A. B[x]
, 
implies: P 
⇒ Q
, 
not: ¬A
, 
false: False
, 
so_apply: x[s1;s2]
, 
subtype_rel: A ⊆r B
, 
prop: ℙ
, 
almost-full: AFx,y:T.R[x; y]
, 
squash: ↓T
, 
uniform-TI: uniform-TI(T;x,y.R[x; y];t.Q[t])
, 
nat: ℕ
, 
decidable: Dec(P)
, 
consistent-seq: R-consistent-seq(n)
, 
so_lambda: λ2x.t[x]
, 
le: A ≤ B
, 
and: P ∧ Q
, 
less_than': less_than'(a;b)
, 
so_apply: x[s]
, 
int_seg: {i..j-}
, 
lelt: i ≤ j < k
, 
guard: {T}
, 
eq_int: (i =z j)
, 
subtract: n - m
, 
ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi 
, 
btrue: tt
, 
so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y]
, 
AFbar: AFbar()
, 
or: P ∨ Q
, 
iff: P 
⇐⇒ Q
, 
rev_implies: P 
⇐ Q
, 
uiff: uiff(P;Q)
, 
top: Top
, 
true: True
, 
isr: isr(x)
, 
assert: ↑b
, 
bfalse: ff
, 
exposed-it: exposed-it
, 
bool: 𝔹
, 
unit: Unit
, 
it: ⋅
, 
exists: ∃x:A. B[x]
, 
sq_type: SQType(T)
, 
bnot: ¬bb
, 
ge: i ≥ j 
, 
nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T 
, 
int_upper: {i...}
, 
sq_stable: SqStable(P)
, 
AF-spread-law: AF-spread-law(x,y.R[x; y])
, 
cand: A c∧ B
, 
outl: outl(x)
, 
isl: isl(x)
, 
less_than: a < b
Lemmas referenced : 
not_wf, 
nat_wf, 
AF-spread-law_wf, 
AFbar_wf, 
unit_wf2, 
int_seg_wf, 
decidable__AFbar, 
all_wf, 
int_seg_subtype_nat, 
false_wf, 
subtype_rel_dep_function, 
subtype_rel_sets, 
and_wf, 
le_wf, 
less_than_wf, 
less_than_transitivity2, 
le_weakening2, 
subtype_rel_self, 
AF-path-barred, 
uall_wf, 
almost-full_wf, 
subtract_wf, 
decidable__le, 
not-le-2, 
less-iff-le, 
condition-implies-le, 
minus-one-mul, 
zero-add, 
minus-one-mul-top, 
minus-add, 
minus-minus, 
add-associates, 
add-swap, 
add-commutes, 
add_functionality_wrt_le, 
add-zero, 
le-add-cancel, 
decidable__lt, 
not-lt-2, 
add-mul-special, 
zero-mul, 
le-add-cancel-alt, 
eq_int_wf, 
bool_wf, 
eqtt_to_assert, 
assert_of_eq_int, 
less_than_transitivity1, 
le_weakening, 
less_than_irreflexivity, 
eqff_to_assert, 
equal_wf, 
bool_cases_sqequal, 
subtype_base_sq, 
bool_subtype_base, 
iff_transitivity, 
assert_wf, 
bnot_wf, 
equal-wf-T-base, 
iff_weakening_uiff, 
assert_of_bnot, 
int_upper_subtype_nat, 
nat_properties, 
nequal-le-implies, 
true_wf, 
sq_stable__le, 
le_antisymmetry_iff, 
not-equal-2, 
set_wf, 
isl_wf, 
int_upper_wf, 
le-add-cancel2, 
outl_wf, 
int_subtype_base, 
set_subtype_base, 
decidable__int_equal
Rules used in proof : 
sqequalSubstitution, 
sqequalTransitivity, 
computationStep, 
sqequalReflexivity, 
isect_memberFormation, 
cut, 
introduction, 
sqequalRule, 
sqequalHypSubstitution, 
lambdaEquality, 
dependent_functionElimination, 
thin, 
hypothesisEquality, 
voidElimination, 
applyEquality, 
functionExtensionality, 
cumulativity, 
hypothesis, 
universeEquality, 
extract_by_obid, 
isectElimination, 
rename, 
imageElimination, 
imageMemberEquality, 
baseClosed, 
functionEquality, 
isect_memberEquality, 
because_Cache, 
strong_bar_Induction, 
unionEquality, 
natural_numberEquality, 
setElimination, 
dependent_set_memberEquality, 
equalityTransitivity, 
equalitySymmetry, 
independent_isectElimination, 
independent_pairFormation, 
lambdaFormation, 
intEquality, 
setEquality, 
productElimination, 
independent_functionElimination, 
unionElimination, 
addEquality, 
voidEquality, 
minusEquality, 
equalityElimination, 
dependent_pairFormation, 
promote_hyp, 
instantiate, 
impliesFunctionality, 
hypothesis_subsumption, 
axiomEquality, 
int_eqReduceTrueSq, 
int_eqReduceFalseSq, 
multiplyEquality, 
inlEquality, 
productEquality, 
isectEquality, 
hyp_replacement, 
applyLambdaEquality
Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}[R:T  {}\mrightarrow{}  T  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}].
    (\mforall{}[Q:T  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}].  uniform-TI(T;x,y.\mneg{}R[x;y];t.Q[t]))  supposing 
          (AFx,y:T.R[x;y]  and 
          (\mforall{}x,y,z:T.    ((\mneg{}R[x;y])  {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mneg{}R[y;z])  {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mneg{}R[x;z]))))
Date html generated:
2017_04_14-AM-07_28_07
Last ObjectModification:
2017_02_27-PM-02_58_25
Theory : bar-induction
Home
Index