Nuprl Lemma : b-almost-full-intersection

This is the main technical lemma from Veldman & Bezem's proof
of the Intuitionistic Ramsey theorem.
We were able to closely follow their proof except that 
before carrying out some of the reasoning steps we have to
"unsquash" some of the hypotheses. 
The needed "unsquashing" is usually done using lemmas
implies-quotient-true or all-quotient-true
(making use of the fact that we can prove canonicalizable(StrictInc)).⋅

∀R,T:ℕ ⟶ ℕ ⟶ ℙ.  (b-almost-full(n,m.R[n;m]) ⇒ b-almost-full(n,m.T[n;m]) ⇒ ⇃(∃n:ℕ. ∃m:{n + 1...}. (R[n;m] ∧ T[n;m])))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  b-almost-full: b-almost-full(n,m.R[n; m]),  quotient: x,y:A//B[x; y],  int_upper: {i...},  nat: ℕ,  prop: ℙ,  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  true: True,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  add: n + m,  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  member: t ∈ T,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  nat: ℕ,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  prop: ℙ,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  or: P ∨ Q,  ge: i ≥ j ,  decidable: Dec(P),  uimplies: b supposing a,  not: ¬A,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  false: False,  top: Top,  and: P ∧ Q,  strict-inc: StrictInc,  guard: {T},  int_upper: {i...},  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  sq_stable: SqStable(P),  squash: ↓T,  subtract: n - m,  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  true: True,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  bfalse: ff,  sq_type: SQType(T),  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  strictly-increasing-seq: strictly-increasing-seq(n;s),  seq-add: s.x@n,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  less_than: a < b,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q),  cand: A c∧ B,  nat_plus: ℕ+,  u-almost-full: u-almost-full(n.A[n]),  compose: f o g,  isr: isr(x),  outr: outr(x),  isl: isl(x),  baf-bar: baf-bar(n,m.R[n; m];n,m.T[n; m];l;a),  pi1: fst(t)
Lemmas referenced :  monotone-bar-induction-strict3,  baf-bar_wf,  int_seg_wf,  strictly-increasing-seq_wf,  istype-nat,  strict-inc_wf,  nat_wf,  nat_properties,  decidable__le,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermVar_wf,  istype-int,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  istype-void,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  istype-le,  seq-add_wf,  int_upper_wf,  upper_subtype_nat,  istype-false,  not-le-2,  sq_stable__le,  condition-implies-le,  minus-add,  minus-one-mul,  zero-add,  minus-one-mul-top,  add-associates,  add-swap,  add-commutes,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  add-zero,  le-add-cancel,  subtype_rel_self,  b-almost-full_wf,  baf-bar-monotone,  le_wf,  trivial-quotient-true,  strict-inc-lower-bound,  eq_int_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_wf,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  nequal-le-implies,  subtract_wf,  int_upper_properties,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  decidable__lt,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  istype-less_than,  add_nat_wf,  add-is-int-iff,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  false_wf,  sq_stable_from_decidable,  decidable__strictly-increasing-seq,  less_than_wf,  int_seg_properties,  set_subtype_base,  lelt_wf,  int_subtype_base,  decidable__equal_int,  less_than_functionality,  le_weakening,  quotient_wf,  all_wf,  exists_wf,  or_wf,  true_wf,  equiv_rel_true,  all-quotient-true,  subtype_rel_function,  int_seg_subtype,  add-mul-special,  zero-mul,  le-add-cancel2,  canonicalizable_wf,  canonicalizable-set,  canonicalizable-base,  Ramsey-n-3,  canonicalizable-nat-to-nat,  primrec-wf2,  nat_plus_properties,  nat_plus_subtype_nat,  less_than_transitivity1,  less_than_irreflexivity,  int_seg_subtype_nat,  implies-quotient-true2,  u-almost-full-finite-intersection,  implies-quotient-true,  compose-strict-inc,  member-less_than,  equal-wf-T-base,  assert_wf,  bnot_wf,  not_wf,  uiff_transitivity,  iff_transitivity,  iff_weakening_uiff,  assert_of_bnot,  decidable__exists_int_seg,  isr_wf,  decidable__assert,  outl_wf,  isl_wf,  le_weakening2,  equal_wf,  le_reflexive,  not_over_exists,  decidable__or,  strictly-increasing-seq-add2-implies,  intformor_wf,  int_formula_prop_or_lemma,  equal-wf-base,  decidable__and2,  int_seg_subtype_special,  int_seg_cases,  lt_int_wf,  le_int_wf,  assert_of_lt_int,  assert_functionality_wrt_uiff,  bnot_of_lt_int,  assert_of_le_int,  squash_wf,  nat_plus_wf,  b-almost-full-intersection-lemma,  imax_wf,  subtype_rel_dep_function,  imax_strict_ub
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation_alt,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality_alt,  isectElimination,  applyEquality,  hypothesisEquality,  inhabitedIsType,  setElimination,  rename,  hypothesis,  setIsType,  functionIsType,  universeIsType,  natural_numberEquality,  functionExtensionality,  because_Cache,  closedConclusion,  functionEquality,  productEquality,  unionEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  addEquality,  unionElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  approximateComputation,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation_alt,  int_eqEquality,  isect_memberEquality_alt,  voidElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  productElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  imageElimination,  minusEquality,  instantiate,  universeEquality,  intEquality,  equalityElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  equalityIstype,  promote_hyp,  cumulativity,  hypothesis_subsumption,  productIsType,  applyLambdaEquality,  pointwiseFunctionality,  baseApply,  int_eqReduceTrueSq,  equalityIsType1,  int_eqReduceFalseSq,  inlFormation_alt,  unionIsType,  setEquality,  multiplyEquality,  equalityIsType4,  inrFormation_alt,  equalityIsType3,  hyp_replacement

Latex:
\mforall{}R,T:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}.
    (b-almost-full(n,m.R[n;m])
    {}\mRightarrow{}  b-almost-full(n,m.T[n;m])
    {}\mRightarrow{}  \00D9(\mexists{}n:\mBbbN{}.  \mexists{}m:\{n  +  1...\}.  (R[n;m]  \mwedge{}  T[n;m])))



Date html generated: 2020_05_19-PM-10_05_50
Last ObjectModification: 2019_10_29-PM-01_46_29

Theory : continuity


Home Index